Essentially, despite expounding on the issues for 30 pages, the opinion just stands for the unremarkable (and, largely, undisputed) proposition that a borrower has standing to sue for wrongful foreclosure where the transaction by which the beneficiary acquired the loan was void at its inception. That point was even conceded, to some degree, by respondents in their brief.
from Byrd Mix http://ift.tt/1oy5wtZ via byrd memphis developer
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1QdmxV5
No comments:
Post a Comment